NDAYISENGA v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

NDAYISENGA v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

Given the applicant's first-time offender status, admission of guilt, youth, and the small quantity of cannabis, the High Court's sentence of 20 years imprisonment and a 10,000,000 Frw fine was excessive. The appropriate sentence is 15 years imprisonment and a 5,000,000 Frw fine, in line with statutory minimums and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00620/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Ndayisenga Jean Claude; Respondent: Ubushinjacyaha
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
18 September 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00620/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; sentence varied.
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ndayisenga Jean Claude

Applicant

Ubushinjacyaha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in imposing an excessive sentence on Ndayisenga Jean Claude despite his admission of guilt and mitigating circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

Given the applicant's first-time offender status, admission of guilt, youth, and the small quantity of cannabis, the High Court's sentence of 20 years imprisonment and a 10,000,000 Frw fine was excessive. The appropriate sentence is 15 years imprisonment and a 5,000,000 Frw fine, in line with statutory minimums and comparable cases.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; sentence varied.

Orders

  • The High Court's decision on sentence is set aside in part.
  • Ndayisenga Jean Claude is sentenced to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 Frw.