NDIMUKAGA vs BNN Ltd N’UNDI

NDIMUKAGA vs BNN Ltd N’UNDI

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction because the damages awarded by the lower courts did not reach the threshold of 75,000,000 Frw as required by law; therefore, the appeal is inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00050/2022/CA
Parties
Applicant: Ndimukaga Frodouard; Respondent: BNN Ltd; Respondent: PROFILCO Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
18 November 2022
Case Number
RCOMAA 00050/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Jurisdiction and Costs
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Appeals, Damages, Legal Costs
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Jurisdiction Appeals Damages Legal Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ndimukaga Frodouard

Applicant

BNN Ltd

Respondent

PROFILCO Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Jurisdiction and Costs

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal based on the value of the claim
  2. 2 Whether PROFILCO Ltd is entitled to legal costs and advocate fees

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction because the damages awarded by the lower courts did not reach the threshold of 75,000,000 Frw as required by law; therefore, the appeal is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • Ndimukaga Frodouard to pay PROFILCO Ltd 500,000 Frw as advocate fees and 200,000 Frw as legal costs
  • Court fees correspond to the work done in the case