NIKUZE N’ABANDI v. RADIANT INSURANCE COMPANY N’UNDI

NIKUZE N’ABANDI v. RADIANT INSURANCE COMPANY N’UNDI

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction because the damages awarded in the appealed judgment did not reach the statutory threshold of 75,000,000 Frw; claims based on subsequent valuations or fees are irrelevant for jurisdiction. No evidence supports the claim that the prior judgment was based on a repealed law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCAA 00031/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Nikuze Christine; Applicant: Ndayisenga François; Applicant: Mutamuriza Florence; Applicant: Mukandayisenga Claudine; Applicant: Murekatete Solange; Applicant: Karera François; Respondent: Radiant Insurance Company Ltd; Respondent: REG Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 October 2025
Case Number
RCAA 00031/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Damages, Appeal, Repealed Law
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Insurance Law Jurisdiction Damages Appeal Repealed Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nikuze Christine

Applicant

Ndayisenga François

Applicant

Mutamuriza Florence

Applicant

Mukandayisenga Claudine

Applicant

Murekatete Solange

Applicant

Karera François

Applicant

Radiant Insurance Company Ltd

Respondent

REG Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear the second appeal based on the value of damages awarded in the prior judgment
  2. 2 Whether the prior judgment was based on a repealed or non-existent law
  3. 3 Entitlement to costs and advocate fees

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction because the damages awarded in the appealed judgment did not reach the statutory threshold of 75,000,000 Frw; claims based on subsequent valuations or fees are irrelevant for jurisdiction. No evidence supports the claim that the prior judgment was based on a repealed law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Applicants' second appeal not admitted.
  • Applicants to jointly pay Radiant Insurance Company Ltd and REG Ltd 500,000 Frw each for advocate fees and 300,000 Frw each for costs.