NIYIGENA vs LETA Y’URWANDA (MINADEF)

NIYIGENA vs LETA Y’URWANDA (MINADEF)

The appeal was dismissed because Niyigena Eraste failed to file his claim within the 15-day statutory period after signing the memorandum of disagreement on 06/05/2016, as required by Article 34 of Law No. 32/2015. The law does not require the limitation period to run from the expropriating authority's signature....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RADAA00008/2024
Parties
Appellant: Niyigena Eraste; Respondent: Leta y’u Rwanda (MINADEF)
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
24 January 2025
Case Number
RADAA00008/2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Compensation for Expropriation, Limitation Periods, Valuation Disputes, Procedural Compliance
Source Language
rw
Expropriation Civil Procedure Compensation for Expropriation Limitation Periods Valuation Disputes Procedural Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Niyigena Eraste

Appellant

Leta y’u Rwanda (MINADEF)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appeal by Niyigena Eraste was filed within the statutory limitation period for contesting expropriation compensation
  2. 2 Whether Niyigena Eraste is entitled to additional compensation, damages, and costs

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because Niyigena Eraste failed to file his claim within the 15-day statutory period after signing the memorandum of disagreement on 06/05/2016, as required by Article 34 of Law No. 32/2015. The law does not require the limitation period to run from the expropriating authority's signature. Thus, his claim for additional compensation and damages was time-barred.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Court in RADA00025/2022/HC/KIG is upheld.
  • Niyigena Eraste is ordered to pay MINADEF 500,000 Frw as attorney fees at this appellate level.