UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NIYONZIMA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NIYONZIMA

The appellant failed to prove that the grounds of appeal were submitted within the statutory period. The only timely document was the notice of appeal, not the detailed grounds. The burden of proof rested on the appellant to show timely submission, which he did not discharge. Grounds submitted after the deadline are...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00606/2021/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Niyonzima Fulgence bita papa Hope
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 February 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00606/2021/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Procedure, Burden of Proof, Timeliness of Appeal, Sexual Offences Against Minors
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Appeal Procedure Burden of Proof Timeliness of Appeal Sexual Offences Against Minors

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Niyonzima Fulgence bita papa Hope

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant submitted grounds of appeal within the legally prescribed period
  2. 2 Whether the appellant discharged the burden of proof regarding timely submission of appeal grounds

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to prove that the grounds of appeal were submitted within the statutory period. The only timely document was the notice of appeal, not the detailed grounds. The burden of proof rested on the appellant to show timely submission, which he did not discharge. Grounds submitted after the deadline are inadmissible by law.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Court (RPA 01877/2019/HC/KIG of 09/04/2021) is upheld in all respects.
  • Niyonzima Fulgence is exempted from court costs as he is incarcerated.