Re NIYONZIMA

Re NIYONZIMA

The appeal was inadmissible because the value of the dispute and damages awarded in the original and interpretative judgments was below the 75,000,000 Frw threshold required for a second-level appeal to the Court of Appeal. Therefore, since the original judgment was not appealable, the interpretative judgment could...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCA 00002/2020/CA
Parties
Applicant: Niyonzima Théophile; Respondent: Cyuzuzo Eric; Intervener: Zaninka Janvière
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
9 July 2021
Case Number
RCA 00002/2020/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Admissibility of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Appeals, Interpretation of Judgments, Jurisdictional Thresholds
Civil Procedure Admissibility of Appeals Interpretation of Judgments Jurisdictional Thresholds

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Niyonzima Théophile

Applicant

Cyuzuzo Eric

Respondent

Zaninka Janvière

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Admissibility of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal against the interpretative judgment RS/INTER/RC 00002/2019/HC/MUS is admissible before the Court of Appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was inadmissible because the value of the dispute and damages awarded in the original and interpretative judgments was below the 75,000,000 Frw threshold required for a second-level appeal to the Court of Appeal. Therefore, since the original judgment was not appealable, the interpretative judgment could not be appealed either.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • The appeal of Niyonzima Théophile against the judgment RS/INTER/RC 00002/2019/HC/MUS of the High Court, Musanze Chamber, dated 04/11/2019 is not admitted.
  • Court fees to be borne by the State.