NKURUNZIZA v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

NKURUNZIZA v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

The applicant failed to present any evidence that was both genuinely new and capable of overturning the previous judgment; the documents and testimonies cited were either already in the record or not credible as new evidence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/RP 00069/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Nkurunziza Silas; Respondent: Ubushinjacyaha
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 November 2025
Case Number
RS/REV/RP 00069/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Application for Review Based on New Evidence
Outcome
Application for review dismissed as inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Defilement of a Minor, Review of Criminal Judgment, New Evidence Requirements
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Defilement of a Minor Review of Criminal Judgment New Evidence Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nkurunziza Silas

Applicant

Ubushinjacyaha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Application for Review Based on New Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's request for review based on new evidence meets the legal requirements under Article 197 of Law Nº 027/2019 on criminal procedure

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to present any evidence that was both genuinely new and capable of overturning the previous judgment; the documents and testimonies cited were either already in the record or not credible as new evidence.

Court Disposition

Application for review dismissed as inadmissible.

Orders

  • The request for review of judgment RPAA 00182/2023/CA on grounds of new evidence is not admitted.