Nsabimana v. Ubushinjacyaha

Nsabimana v. Ubushinjacyaha

Because the 15-year imprisonment term imposed by the High Court was already the minimum sentence allowed by law for the offence, the appellant could not be granted any further reduction on the basis of mitigating circumstances. Therefore, the appeal was unfounded.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Nsabimana Dominique; Respondent: Ubushinjacyaha
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Before the Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed as unfounded
Legal Topics
Defilement of a Child Under 14, Mitigating Circumstances, Sentence Reduction, Minimum Statutory Sentence
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Appeal Procedure Defilement of a Child Under 14 Mitigating Circumstances Sentence Reduction Minimum Statutory Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nsabimana Dominique

Appellant

Ubushinjacyaha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Before the Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a sentence already reduced to the minimum statutory term provided by law can be reduced further on appeal on the basis of mitigating circumstances.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal had merit in light of prior Court of Appeal precedent interpreting Article 2(a) of Law No. 059/2023 amending Law No. 68/2018.

Ratio Decidendi

Because the 15-year imprisonment term imposed by the High Court was already the minimum sentence allowed by law for the offence, the appellant could not be granted any further reduction on the basis of mitigating circumstances. Therefore, the appeal was unfounded.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed as unfounded

Orders

  • The appeal filed by Nsabimana Dominique is dismissed as without merit.
  • The judgment RPA 00963/2022/HC/KIG of 29/05/2025 remains unchanged.