UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. NSENGIMANA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. NSENGIMANA

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court properly applied the law and considered all mitigating circumstances, imposing the minimum sentence of 15 years as prescribed by the amended statute; no legal error or abuse of discretion was demonstrated, so the appeal lacked merit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00324/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Nsengimana Diogène
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
13 December 2024
Case Number
RPAA 00324/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Defilement, Mitigation of Sentence, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Defilement Mitigation of Sentence Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Nsengimana Diogène

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Nsengimana Diogène for defilement should be further reduced based on mitigating circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court properly applied the law and considered all mitigating circumstances, imposing the minimum sentence of 15 years as prescribed by the amended statute; no legal error or abuse of discretion was demonstrated, so the appeal lacked merit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The High Court's sentence of 15 years imprisonment is upheld.
  • Court fees are waived as the appellant is incarcerated.