UBUSHINJACYAHA v NSENGIYUMVA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NSENGIYUMVA

The sentence imposed on Nsengiyumva Callixte by the High Court (15 years' imprisonment and 5,000,000 Frw fine) is the minimum allowed by law for the offence of drug trafficking, and cannot be further reduced based on mitigating circumstances under the current legal framework. The appeal is therefore without merit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 01253/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Nsengiyumva Callixte
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
29 December 2025
Case Number
RPAA 01253/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Appeals, Mitigating Circumstances
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Appeals Mitigating Circumstances

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Nsengiyumva Callixte

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Nsengiyumva Callixte could be further reduced based on mitigating circumstances after previous reduction by the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed on Nsengiyumva Callixte by the High Court (15 years' imprisonment and 5,000,000 Frw fine) is the minimum allowed by law for the offence of drug trafficking, and cannot be further reduced based on mitigating circumstances under the current legal framework. The appeal is therefore without merit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal of Nsengiyumva Callixte is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The High Court judgment No RPA 00659/2023/HC/KGL of 21/10/2024 is upheld.