Re NTAGUNGIRA

Re NTAGUNGIRA

There is no ambiguity or obscurity in the Supreme Court judgment RS/INJUST/RC 00012/2020/SC; the applicant's request is an attempt to challenge the merits of the decision, which is not permissible under the procedure for interpretation of judgments.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/INTERT/RC 00001/2022/SC
Parties
Applicant: Ntagungira Jérôme; Respondent: Nsengiyumva Théoneste; Other: Gitungwa Esther
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
18 November 2022
Case Number
RS/INTERT/RC 00001/2022/SC
Procedural Posture
Interpretation of Judgment / Supreme Court Application for Interpretation
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Judgments, Rectification of Judgments, Land Sale Contracts, Restitution
Civil Procedure Interpretation of Judgments Rectification of Judgments Land Sale Contracts Restitution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ntagungira Jérôme

Applicant

Nsengiyumva Théoneste

Respondent

Gitungwa Esther

Other

Procedural Posture

Interpretation of Judgment / Supreme Court Application for Interpretation

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is any ambiguity or obscurity in Supreme Court judgment RS/INJUST/RC 00012/2020/SC requiring interpretation

Ratio Decidendi

There is no ambiguity or obscurity in the Supreme Court judgment RS/INJUST/RC 00012/2020/SC; the applicant's request is an attempt to challenge the merits of the decision, which is not permissible under the procedure for interpretation of judgments.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application by Ntagungira Jérôme for interpretation of Supreme Court judgment RS/INJUST/RC 00012/2020/SC is dismissed as unfounded.
  • There is nothing unclear in the judgment requiring interpretation.