UBUSHINJACYAHA v NTAKIYIMANA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NTAKIYIMANA

The Supreme Court held that despite Ntakiyimana's eventual admission of guilt, the gravity and premeditation of the crime, as well as his initial denial, justified denying further sentence reduction.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPA 0182/09/CS
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Ntakiyimana Jean
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
11 October 2013
Case Number
RPA 0182/09/CS
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; original sentence affirmed.
Legal Topics
Parricide, Plea of Guilty, Sentence Reduction, Judicial Discretion
Criminal Law Parricide Plea of Guilty Sentence Reduction Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Ntakiyimana Jean

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Ntakiyimana's admission of guilt should result in a reduced sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that despite Ntakiyimana's eventual admission of guilt, the gravity and premeditation of the crime, as well as his initial denial, justified denying further sentence reduction.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; original sentence affirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The original judgment is upheld.