UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NTIRENGANYA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NTIRENGANYA

The appeal was dismissed because the sentence imposed was already the minimum permitted by law for the offence, and no legal or factual error by the lower court was established. However, the fine was reduced to reflect the circumstances of the offence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00735/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Ntirenganya Ildéphonse
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 March 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00735/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed in substance; sentence varied as to fine only
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Ntirenganya Ildéphonse

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant should receive a further reduction in sentence due to mitigating circumstances and be exempted from the fine

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the sentence imposed was already the minimum permitted by law for the offence, and no legal or factual error by the lower court was established. However, the fine was reduced to reflect the circumstances of the offence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed in substance; sentence varied as to fine only

Orders

  • The custodial sentence of fifteen (15) years is upheld.
  • The fine is reduced to five million (5,000,000) Rwandan Francs.