UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NYAMINANI

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NYAMINANI

Given that Nyaminani Damascène was a first-time offender, confessed, showed remorse, and the facts were similar to other cases where sentences were reduced to 15 years, the Court of Appeal found it appropriate to further reduce his sentence to 15 years to ensure consistency and fairness.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 01375/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Nyaminani Damascène
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
25 July 2025
Case Number
RPAA 01375/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed; sentence reduced
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Sexual Offences, Appeals
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Sexual Offences Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Nyaminani Damascène

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Nyaminani Damascène should be further reduced on appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Given that Nyaminani Damascène was a first-time offender, confessed, showed remorse, and the facts were similar to other cases where sentences were reduced to 15 years, the Court of Appeal found it appropriate to further reduce his sentence to 15 years to ensure consistency and fairness.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; sentence reduced

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The High Court judgment is varied as to sentence only.