UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NYANDWI Alias

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NYANDWI Alias

The certificate of good conduct presented by the applicant does not constitute decisive new evidence as required by law, as it does not have the capacity to overturn the original judgment or prove innocence; therefore, the application for review is inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/RP00044/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Nyandwi Pascal alias Conseiller
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
31 January 2025
Case Number
RS/REV/RP00044/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Application for Review Based on New Evidence
Outcome
Application for review dismissed as inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Review of Criminal Judgments, New Evidence, Drug Offences
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Review of Criminal Judgments New Evidence Drug Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Nyandwi Pascal alias Conseiller

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Application for Review Based on New Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the evidence presented by the applicant constitutes new evidence justifying review of the judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The certificate of good conduct presented by the applicant does not constitute decisive new evidence as required by law, as it does not have the capacity to overturn the original judgment or prove innocence; therefore, the application for review is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Application for review dismissed as inadmissible.

Orders

  • The application for review based on new evidence is not admitted.
  • The previous judgment remains unchanged.