NYIRAMANA v. NAYINO_144390_kn

NYIRAMANA v. NAYINO_144390_kn

The applicant failed to demonstrate the required urgency or irreparable harm for a stay of execution; eviction and loss of income do not constitute irreparable harm as legal avenues exist for recovery if she prevails. No error was found in the High Court's refusal to grant the urgent application.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.2-2016
Parties
Applicant: Nyiramana Chantal; Respondent: Nayino Patricie
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
10 February 2014
Case Number
RCA 005/13/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Urgent Applications, Stay of Execution, Requirements for Urgent Relief
Civil Procedure Urgent Applications Stay of Execution Requirements for Urgent Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nyiramana Chantal

Applicant

Nayino Patricie

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the urgent application by Nyiramana Chantal met the legal requirements to stay execution of the High Court judgment pending review

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate the required urgency or irreparable harm for a stay of execution; eviction and loss of income do not constitute irreparable harm as legal avenues exist for recovery if she prevails. No error was found in the High Court's refusal to grant the urgent application.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Applicant to pay court costs of 21,800 Rwandan Francs within the prescribed period, failing which enforcement measures will be taken.