ORACLE ENTREPRISES Ltd v. ECOBANK Ltd

ORACLE ENTREPRISES Ltd v. ECOBANK Ltd

The Supreme Court found that ORACLE ENTREPRISES Ltd lost on the same grounds in both lower courts, specifically regarding the lack of evidence of ECOBANK Ltd's liability and the issue of payment ordered in a criminal case, thus barring the appeal under Article 28 of Organic Law No. 03/2012.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 0009/14/CS
Parties
Applicant: ORACLE ENTREPRISES Ltd; Respondent: ECOBANK Ltd
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
2 October 2015
Case Number
RCOMAA 0009/14/CS
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Jurisdictional Challenge
Outcome
Appeal not admitted for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Appellate Jurisdiction, Bank Liability, Cheque Endorsement
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Appellate Jurisdiction Bank Liability Cheque Endorsement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ORACLE ENTREPRISES Ltd

Applicant

ECOBANK Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Jurisdictional Challenge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether ORACLE ENTREPRISES Ltd lost on the same grounds in both lower courts, thus barring appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 28 of Organic Law No. 03/2012

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found that ORACLE ENTREPRISES Ltd lost on the same grounds in both lower courts, specifically regarding the lack of evidence of ECOBANK Ltd's liability and the issue of payment ordered in a criminal case, thus barring the appeal under Article 28 of Organic Law No. 03/2012.

Court Disposition

Appeal not admitted for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • ORACLE ENTREPRISES Ltd to pay court fees of 100,000 Frw