PROSECUTION v. KANGABE

PROSECUTION v. KANGABE

Neither the presence of young children nor the convict's illness nor her husband's illness constitutes sufficient grounds to stay execution of the criminal judgments, as Rwandan law provides for special care for children and medical treatment for prisoners. The appeal lacks merit and the High Court's decision is sustained.

Citation
RLR V.2-2019
Parties
Appellant: Prosecution; Respondent: Kangabe Christine; Interested Party: BPR Ltd
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
9 June 2016
Case Number
RPA 0027/16/CS
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment sustained.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Case Review, Imprisonment of Mothers, Prisoner Medical Care
Source Language
en, rw

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Prosecution

Appellant

Kangabe Christine

Respondent

BPR Ltd

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the execution of criminal judgments should be suspended pending review due to the convict's illness, her husband's illness, and the presence of young children.

Ratio Decidendi

Neither the presence of young children nor the convict's illness nor her husband's illness constitutes sufficient grounds to stay execution of the criminal judgments, as Rwandan law provides for special care for children and medical treatment for prisoners. The appeal lacks merit and the High Court's decision is sustained.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment sustained.

Orders

  • Appeal by Kangabe Christine dismissed for lack of merit.
  • Rulings of the High Court, chamber of Rwamagana, sustained.