PROSECUTION v. KANGABE
Neither the presence of young children nor the convict's illness nor her husband's illness constitutes sufficient grounds to stay execution of the criminal judgments, as Rwandan law provides for special care for children and medical treatment for prisoners. The appeal lacks merit and the High Court's decision is sustained.
- Citation
- RLR V.2-2019
- Parties
- Appellant: Prosecution; Respondent: Kangabe Christine; Interested Party: BPR Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2016
- Case Number
- RPA 0027/16/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment sustained.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Case Review, Imprisonment of Mothers, Prisoner Medical Care
- Source Language
- en, rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prosecution
Appellant
Kangabe Christine
Respondent
BPR Ltd
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the execution of criminal judgments should be suspended pending review due to the convict's illness, her husband's illness, and the presence of young children.
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the presence of young children nor the convict's illness nor her husband's illness constitutes sufficient grounds to stay execution of the criminal judgments, as Rwandan law provides for special care for children and medical treatment for prisoners. The appeal lacks merit and the High Court's decision is sustained.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment sustained.
Orders
- Appeal by Kangabe Christine dismissed for lack of merit.
- Rulings of the High Court, chamber of Rwamagana, sustained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment