QI ZHICHENG v WANG YONGFEI
The appeal was dismissed because the respondent was not given an opportunity to respond to evidence (telephone number and vehicle ownership) used by the arbitrators, violating procedural fairness as required by Article 47 of the Arbitration Law. The High Commercial Court correctly set aside the arbitral award.
- Citation
- RCOMAA 00043/2019/CA
- Parties
- Appellant: QI ZHICHENG; Respondent: WANG YONGFEI
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2019
- Case Number
- RCOMAA 00043/2019/CA
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Arbitration Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Commercial Court judgment affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Arbitral Award, Right to Be Heard, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- en, rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
QI ZHICHENG
Appellant
WANG YONGFEI
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Arbitration Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Commercial Court lawfully set aside the arbitral award for lack of procedural fairness
- 2 Whether the respondent was denied the right to respond to evidence used by arbitrators
- 3 Whether the appeal procedure was properly followed under the Arbitration Law
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the respondent was not given an opportunity to respond to evidence (telephone number and vehicle ownership) used by the arbitrators, violating procedural fairness as required by Article 47 of the Arbitration Law. The High Commercial Court correctly set aside the arbitral award.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Commercial Court judgment affirmed.
Orders
- QI ZHICHENG to pay WANG YONGFEI 1,000,000 Rwandan francs as attorney fees
- Court costs to be borne as incurred
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment