Radiant v Access Bank

Radiant v Access Bank

The application for clarification was filed after the one-month statutory period and did not concern a clerical error affecting execution; therefore, it was inadmissible and the lower court's decision was correct.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RSA/RECT/RCOM 00001/2022/CA
Parties
Appellant: Radiant Insurance Company Ltd; Respondent: Access Bank Rwanda Ltd; Other: Bepk Consultant Ltd; Other: Tuyizere Gerard
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
13 December 2022
Case Number
RSA/RECT/RCOM 00001/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Clarification of Judgment, Time Limits for Applications, Execution of Judgments
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Clarification of Judgment Time Limits for Applications Execution of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Radiant Insurance Company Ltd

Appellant

Access Bank Rwanda Ltd

Respondent

Bepk Consultant Ltd

Other

Tuyizere Gerard

Other

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the application by Radiant Insurance Company Ltd for clarification of judgment RCOMA00351/2021/HCC was admissible given the statutory time limit.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for clarification was filed after the one-month statutory period and did not concern a clerical error affecting execution; therefore, it was inadmissible and the lower court's decision was correct.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Radiant Insurance Company Ltd is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the Commercial High Court in RSA/INTERT/RCOM 00001/2022/HCC is upheld.