RADIANT INSURANCE COMPANY LTD V NTEGEREJUMUREMYI

RADIANT INSURANCE COMPANY LTD V NTEGEREJUMUREMYI

The insurer is liable for half of the compensation since both the insured driver and the cyclist contributed to the accident; the insurer's failure to request a 'contre-expertise' means the claimant's medical assessment is binding for compensation purposes.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCA 00008/2023/HC/RWG
Parties
Appellant: Radiant Insurance Company Ltd; Respondent: Ntegerejumuremyi Louis
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 October 2023
Case Number
RCA 00008/2023/HC/RWG
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Motor Vehicle Accident, Compensation for Bodily Injury, Apportionment of Liability, Insurance Indemnity, Medical Evidence
Source Language
rw
Insurance Law Tort Law Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation for Bodily Injury Apportionment of Liability Insurance Indemnity Medical Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Radiant Insurance Company Ltd

Appellant

Ntegerejumuremyi Louis

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the insurer can refuse to pay compensation based solely on the accident report (PV d'accident)
  2. 2 Whether compensation awarded was based on proper medical evidence in absence of a 'contre-expertise'

Ratio Decidendi

The insurer is liable for half of the compensation since both the insured driver and the cyclist contributed to the accident; the insurer's failure to request a 'contre-expertise' means the claimant's medical assessment is binding for compensation purposes.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Radiant Insurance Company Ltd is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the Intermediate Court of Ngoma (RC00091/2022/TGI/NGOMA) is upheld in all respects.