UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HABARUREMA
The conviction was upheld based on credible witness testimony, defendant's own confession, and corroborating medical report, establishing the victim's mental disability and non-consensual intercourse. The absence of an expert medical certificate did not invalidate the evidence. Sentence was reduced due to mitigating circumstances, notably first-time offence.
- Citation
- RPAA 00403/2025/CA
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant/defendant: Habarurema Damascène
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2025
- Case Number
- RPAA 00403/2025/CA
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sexual Violence, Disability, Evidence, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances
- Source Language
- rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Habarurema Damascène
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Habarurema Damascène was convicted of rape against a mentally disabled person without sufficient evidence
- 2 Whether Habarurema Damascène should have his sentence reduced
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was upheld based on credible witness testimony, defendant's own confession, and corroborating medical report, establishing the victim's mental disability and non-consensual intercourse. The absence of an expert medical certificate did not invalidate the evidence. Sentence was reduced due to mitigating circumstances, notably first-time offence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; sentence varied
Orders
- Conviction upheld
- Sentence reduced to 9 years imprisonment and 500,000 Frw fine
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment