Re Roger Martyn SHAW

Re Roger Martyn SHAW

The court found that the judgment RCOMAA00035/2024/CA contained clerical errors, including the miswriting of the applicant's name and other typographical mistakes, and that these should be corrected in accordance with Article 140 of Law Nº 22/2018.

Citation
RS/RECT/RCOM00002/2025/CA
Parties
Applicant: Roger Martyn SHAW; Respondent: Kazina Balimba Joseph; Respondent: Idamange Faith SHAW; Respondent: Lakeside Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 July 2025
Case Number
RS/RECT/RCOM00002/2025/CA
Procedural Posture
Rectification of Judgment / Court of Appeal Decision on Rectification
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Rectification of Judgment, Clerical Errors, Judgment Correction
Source Language
rw

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roger Martyn SHAW

Applicant

Kazina Balimba Joseph

Respondent

Idamange Faith SHAW

Respondent

Lakeside Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Rectification of Judgment / Court of Appeal Decision on Rectification

  1. 1 Whether there are clerical errors in judgment RCOMAA00035/2024/CA that require correction

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the judgment RCOMAA00035/2024/CA contained clerical errors, including the miswriting of the applicant's name and other typographical mistakes, and that these should be corrected in accordance with Article 140 of Law Nº 22/2018.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Clerical errors in paragraphs 35 and 55 of judgment RCOMAA00035/2024/CA to be corrected from 'Robert Martyn Shaw' to 'Roger Martyn SHAW'.
  • Other typographical errors in paragraphs 36, 57, 58, 64, 72, 77, 79, and 83 to be corrected as specified in paragraph 8 of this judgment.