RUCAMIHIGO v. MUREKATETE N’UNDI

RUCAMIHIGO v. MUREKATETE N’UNDI

The appeal is inadmissible because both the Intermediate Court and the High Court decided the main issue—whether the preliminary sale contract should be rescinded—on the same grounds, namely that the respondent had fully paid the agreed price and the contract was lawfully executed. Thus, under Article 52(3) of Law...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCAA 00045/2024/CA
Parties
Appellant: Rucamihigo Alphonse; Respondent: Murekatete Clémentine Vervelde; Respondent: Karega Jean Baptiste
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
12 September 2025
Case Number
RCAA 00045/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Appellate Jurisdiction, Preliminary Objection, Contract Rescission, Real Property Sale, Costs and Attorney Fees
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Contract Law Property Law Appellate Jurisdiction Preliminary Objection Contract Rescission Real Property Sale Costs and Attorney Fees

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rucamihigo Alphonse

Appellant

Murekatete Clémentine Vervelde

Respondent

Karega Jean Baptiste

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is admissible where the appellant lost in both lower courts on the same grounds
  2. 2 Whether the appellant is liable for costs and attorney fees

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is inadmissible because both the Intermediate Court and the High Court decided the main issue—whether the preliminary sale contract should be rescinded—on the same grounds, namely that the respondent had fully paid the agreed price and the contract was lawfully executed. Thus, under Article 52(3) of Law No. 30/2018, the Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Objection to jurisdiction upheld.
  • Appeal not admitted.