Re RWAMUCYO (PETITION FOR NULLIFICATION OF ELECTIONS)
The Supreme Court held that the petition was properly filed directly to the Court, as neither the Constitution nor the Organic Law requires prior referral to the National Electoral Commission. The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to support allegations of abuse of office, illegal campaigning, or corruption. Therefore, there were no grounds to nullify the election.
- Citation
- RS/SPEC/0001/13/CS
- Parties
- Petitioner: Rwamucyo Gisaza Séverin; Respondent: Rusiha Gastone; Interested Party: National Electoral Commission
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2013
- Case Number
- RS/SPEC/0001/13/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Election Nullification, Burden of Proof, Hierarchy of Norms, Election Campaign Procedures
- Source Language
- en
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rwamucyo Gisaza Séverin
Petitioner
Rusiha Gastone
Respondent
National Electoral Commission
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petition should be dismissed for not being first referred to the National Electoral Commission
- 2 Whether there are grounds for nullifying the elections for Deputy Representative of Disabled Persons
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that the petition was properly filed directly to the Court, as neither the Constitution nor the Organic Law requires prior referral to the National Electoral Commission. The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to support allegations of abuse of office, illegal campaigning, or corruption. Therefore, there were no grounds to nullify the election.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- Petition admitted for consideration
- Petition found without merit
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment