RWAKARENGWA vs. AKARERE KA NYAMAGABE

RWAKARENGWA vs. AKARERE KA NYAMAGABE

The applicant failed to provide evidence that the District of Nyamagabe was responsible for the alleged property damage or that he was entitled to compensation under the law. The burden of proof was not met, and the District was not shown to be liable for the acts complained of.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RADA 00002/2023/HC/NYZ
Parties
Applicant: Rwakarengwa Jean; Respondent: Akarere ka Nyamagabe
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
14 February 2024
Case Number
RADA 00002/2023/HC/NYZ
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment (high Court, Appellate Division)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Burden of Proof, Compensation for Public Works, Liability for Property Damage, Judicial Review of Administrative Action
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Evidence Law Administrative Law Burden of Proof Compensation for Public Works Liability for Property Damage Judicial Review of Administrative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rwakarengwa Jean

Applicant

Akarere ka Nyamagabe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment (high Court, Appellate Division)

  1. 1 Whether Rwakarengwa Jean's property was damaged by the Huye-Kitabi road works in 2019 so as to make the District of Nyamagabe liable for compensation.
  2. 2 Whether any compensation or damages are due in this case.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide evidence that the District of Nyamagabe was responsible for the alleged property damage or that he was entitled to compensation under the law. The burden of proof was not met, and the District was not shown to be liable for the acts complained of.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Rwakarengwa Jean is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the Intermediate Court in RAD 00004/2022/TGI/NYBE is upheld in full.