RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY (RRA) v. BOUTIQUE BWANACYAMBWE LTD

RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY (RRA) v. BOUTIQUE BWANACYAMBWE LTD

The Court of Appeal found that both the Commercial Court and the High Commercial Court decided against RRA on the same substantive ground: that the additional taxes and penalties were imposed as if for a criminal offence without a conviction or admission, contrary to law. Therefore, under Article 52(3) of Law No....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00046/2024/CA
Parties
Appellant: RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY (RRA); Respondent: BOUTIQUE BWANACYAMBWE Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 March 2025
Case Number
RCOMAA 00046/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (tax/customs) / Court of Appeal Second Appeal, Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Second appeal struck out for lack of jurisdiction; preliminary objection upheld.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts, Customs Duties and Offences, Tax Assessment and Challenge, Principle of Res Judicata in Appeals
Source Language
rw
Tax Law Customs Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts Customs Duties and Offences Tax Assessment and Challenge Principle of Res Judicata in Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY (RRA)

Appellant

BOUTIQUE BWANACYAMBWE Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (tax/customs) / Court of Appeal Second Appeal, Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal where the appellant lost in both lower courts on the same grounds
  2. 2 Whether the taxes and penalties imposed on BOUTIQUE BWANACYAMBWE Ltd were lawfully assessed and enforced

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that both the Commercial Court and the High Commercial Court decided against RRA on the same substantive ground: that the additional taxes and penalties were imposed as if for a criminal offence without a conviction or admission, contrary to law. Therefore, under Article 52(3) of Law No. 30/2018, the second appeal was inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Second appeal struck out for lack of jurisdiction; preliminary objection upheld.

Orders

  • RRA to pay BOUTIQUE BWANACYAMBWE Ltd RWF 500,000 as advocate's fee and RWF 200,000 as case follow-up costs at this level.
  • Court fees paid by RRA for the appeal correspond to the work done in the case.