GAKIRE v NDAGIJIMANA

GAKIRE v NDAGIJIMANA

DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd, as a resident of Mauritius without a permanent establishment in Rwanda, was not subject to the 15% withholding tax under the Rwanda-Mauritius Double Taxation Agreement. RRA had no legal basis to withhold or retain the tax. However, as DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd is not a taxpayer...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00048/2022/CA
Parties
Appellant: RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY; Respondent: DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
16 June 2023
Case Number
RCOMAA 00048/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal partially allowed; previous judgment modified regarding interest.
Legal Topics
Double Taxation, Withholding Tax, International Tax Treaties, Jurisdiction, Procedural Law
Source Language
rw
Tax Law Commercial Law International Law Double Taxation Withholding Tax International Tax Treaties Jurisdiction Procedural Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

RWANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY

Appellant

DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd was subject to double taxation on profits earned in Rwanda
  2. 2 Whether the appeal by DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd in the High Commercial Court was procedurally valid
  3. 3 Whether RRA should pay interest on the tax withheld from DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd, a non-resident

Ratio Decidendi

DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd, as a resident of Mauritius without a permanent establishment in Rwanda, was not subject to the 15% withholding tax under the Rwanda-Mauritius Double Taxation Agreement. RRA had no legal basis to withhold or retain the tax. However, as DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd is not a taxpayer under Rwandan law, it is not entitled to interest on the refunded amount. The cross-appeal was procedurally valid.

Court Disposition

Appeal partially allowed; previous judgment modified regarding interest.

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Commercial Court (RCOMA 00127/2021/HCC) is modified to remove the order for RRA to pay interest to DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd.
  • RRA is to refund the principal tax amount withheld to DUCRAY LENOIR INTERNATIONAL Ltd.