SENGOGA N’ABANDI v. AKARERE KA NYARUGENGE

SENGOGA N’ABANDI v. AKARERE KA NYARUGENGE

The Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction over appeals where the damages claimed were not awarded or determined after contestation by the lower courts; since no such damages were awarded in this case, the appeal is inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RADAA 0008/15/CS
Parties
Applicant: Sengoga Idrissa; Applicant: Agaba Christine; Applicant: Semutwa Augustin; Applicant: Kabungo Omar; Applicant: Moenback Hélène; Applicant: Muhorakeye M. Claudine; Applicant: Umuyobozi Mukuru wa Rwandafoam; Respondent: Akarere ka Nyarugenge
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
8 July 2016
Case Number
RADAA 0008/15/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Supreme Court, Termination of Administrative Contracts, Quantum of Damages for Appellate Jurisdiction
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Contract Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction of Supreme Court Termination of Administrative Contracts Quantum of Damages for Appellate Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sengoga Idrissa

Applicant

Agaba Christine

Applicant

Semutwa Augustin

Applicant

Kabungo Omar

Applicant

Moenback Hélène

Applicant

Muhorakeye M. Claudine

Applicant

Umuyobozi Mukuru wa Rwandafoam

Applicant

Akarere ka Nyarugenge

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court had jurisdiction to hear the appeal based on the quantum of damages claimed or awarded
  2. 2 Whether the termination of the lease contracts by Akarere ka Nyarugenge was lawful

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction over appeals where the damages claimed were not awarded or determined after contestation by the lower courts; since no such damages were awarded in this case, the appeal is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • Objection to jurisdiction upheld
  • Appeal declared inadmissible