UBUSHINJACYAHA v. SINGIRANKABO

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. SINGIRANKABO

Singirankabo Védaste used a deadly traditional weapon (agasuka) to strike Mukankusi Anne Marie on the head, a vital part, resulting in death three days later. Medical evidence confirmed death was caused by head injury. Legal precedent establishes that intent to kill is inferred from such circumstances, and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00040/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Singirankabo Védaste
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 October 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00040/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Intentional Homicide, Aggravated Assault, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Intentional Homicide Aggravated Assault Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Singirankabo Védaste

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant committed intentional homicide or aggravated assault causing death
  2. 2 Whether the defendant is entitled to further mitigation of sentence

Ratio Decidendi

Singirankabo Védaste used a deadly traditional weapon (agasuka) to strike Mukankusi Anne Marie on the head, a vital part, resulting in death three days later. Medical evidence confirmed death was caused by head injury. Legal precedent establishes that intent to kill is inferred from such circumstances, and the minimum sentence for intentional homicide is 15 years imprisonment without a fine.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction for intentional homicide affirmed
  • Sentence modified to 15 years imprisonment; fine of 5,000,000 Frw removed