TEMAHAGARI v. AKARERE KA KICUKIRO N’ABANDI

TEMAHAGARI v. AKARERE KA KICUKIRO N’ABANDI

The Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal under Article 28(2)(2) of Organic Law No. 03/2012/OL, as the relevant legal provisions were not repealed and the property value was not properly established; before deciding on jurisdiction based on value, an expert must be appointed to determine the true value of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RADAA 0001/13/CS
Parties
Applicant: Temahagari Justin; Respondent: Akarere ka Kicukiro; Interested Party: Sinyigaya Silas; Interested Party: Kalisa Floribert
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
12 December 2014
Case Number
RADAA 0001/13/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Preliminary Ruling
Outcome
Jurisdictional objection upheld; proceedings suspended pending expert valuation.
Legal Topics
Land Ownership, Jurisdiction, Valuation of Immovable Property, Registration of Land Rights
Source Language
rw
Property Law Civil Procedure Land Ownership Jurisdiction Valuation of Immovable Property Registration of Land Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Temahagari Justin

Applicant

Akarere ka Kicukiro

Respondent

Sinyigaya Silas

Interested Party

Kalisa Floribert

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Preliminary Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the appeal based on the legal provisions cited
  2. 2 Whether the relevant legal provisions governing land rights were repealed
  3. 3 How the value of the disputed property should be determined for jurisdictional purposes

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal under Article 28(2)(2) of Organic Law No. 03/2012/OL, as the relevant legal provisions were not repealed and the property value was not properly established; before deciding on jurisdiction based on value, an expert must be appointed to determine the true value of the property.

Court Disposition

Jurisdictional objection upheld; proceedings suspended pending expert valuation.

Orders

  • Appoint an expert to determine the true value of plot No. 9318 in Kicukiro District.
  • Hearing adjourned to 07/01/2015 for expert appointment.