TEUSCHER v BUFCOFFER

TEUSCHER v BUFCOFFER

Only a party who has filed a substantive claim in the court may file an urgent application for provisional measures under Article 185 of Law No 22/2018; since TEUSCHER INVEST LTD had not filed a substantive claim in the appellate court, its urgent application was inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOM 00004/2022/CA
Parties
Applicant: TEUSCHER INVEST LTD; Respondent: BUFCOFFEE LTD
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
10 June 2022
Case Number
RCOM 00004/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Ruling on Urgent Application (interlocutory)
Outcome
Application dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Urgent Applications, Standing to Bring Urgent Application, Security for Debt, Interpretation of Procedural Statutes
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Urgent Applications Standing to Bring Urgent Application Security for Debt Interpretation of Procedural Statutes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

TEUSCHER INVEST LTD

Applicant

BUFCOFFEE LTD

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Ruling on Urgent Application (interlocutory)

  1. 1 Whether a party who has not filed a substantive claim in the appellate court may file an urgent application for provisional measures under Article 185 of Law No 22/2018

Ratio Decidendi

Only a party who has filed a substantive claim in the court may file an urgent application for provisional measures under Article 185 of Law No 22/2018; since TEUSCHER INVEST LTD had not filed a substantive claim in the appellate court, its urgent application was inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • The urgent application filed by TEUSCHER INVEST LTD is not admitted.
  • Court fees are assessed as incurred.