TEUSCHER INVEST LTD v BUFCOFFEE LTD

TEUSCHER INVEST LTD v BUFCOFFEE LTD

Only a party who has filed a substantive claim before the court may file an urgent application; a respondent in an appeal with no substantive claim pending before the appellate court lacks standing to bring such an application. TEUSCHER INVEST LTD's urgent application was therefore inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOM 00004/2022/CA
Parties
Applicant: TEUSCHER INVEST LTD; Respondent: BUFCOFFEE LTD
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
10 June 2022
Case Number
RCOM 00004/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Interlocutory Application (urgent Motion) Before Court of Appeal
Outcome
urgent application dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Urgent Applications, Standing to Bring Urgent Application, Security Measures Pending Appeal
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Urgent Applications Standing to Bring Urgent Application Security Measures Pending Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

TEUSCHER INVEST LTD

Applicant

BUFCOFFEE LTD

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Interlocutory Application (urgent Motion) Before Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a party who is not the claimant in the substantive case may file an urgent application (ikirego cyihutirwa) in the Court of Appeal when no substantive claim is pending before that court

Ratio Decidendi

Only a party who has filed a substantive claim before the court may file an urgent application; a respondent in an appeal with no substantive claim pending before the appellate court lacks standing to bring such an application. TEUSCHER INVEST LTD's urgent application was therefore inadmissible.

Court Disposition

urgent application dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • The urgent application filed by TEUSCHER INVEST LTD is not admitted.
  • Court fees correspond to the procedural steps taken.