TORERO vs TWAGIRAMUNGU

TORERO vs TWAGIRAMUNGU

An appeal is not admissible against a judgment rendered upon review for injustice, nor against any explanatory or corrective judgment thereof, as such judgments are final and not subject to further appeal under Rwandan law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/RECT/RC00002/2023/CA
Parties
Applicant: Torero Boniface; Respondent: Twagiramungu Vincent
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 October 2023
Case Number
RS/RECT/RC00002/2023/CA
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Admissibility of Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Appeal, Res Judicata, Review for Injustice, Costs
Civil Procedure Appeal Res Judicata Review for Injustice Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Torero Boniface

Applicant

Twagiramungu Vincent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Ruling on Admissibility of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether an appeal is admissible against a judgment rendered upon review for injustice and its explanatory or corrective decisions
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to costs and attorney fees

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal is not admissible against a judgment rendered upon review for injustice, nor against any explanatory or corrective judgment thereof, as such judgments are final and not subject to further appeal under Rwandan law.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • Torero Boniface's appeal is not admitted as the judgment appealed from is not appealable.
  • Torero Boniface is ordered to pay Twagiramungu Vincent 500,000 RWF as attorney fees and 200,000 RWF as costs.