UBUSHINJACYAHA vs TWAGIRAMUNGU

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs TWAGIRAMUNGU

The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear the second appeal because the High Court relied on documents submitted after the closure of the hearing without reopening proceedings, as provided by Article 52(4) of Law No. 30/2018. The objection based on the amount of compensation is unfounded, as in criminal cases,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00091/2020/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Twagiramungu Jean Damascene; Civil Party: Umuhoza Alliance; Civil Party: Mukeshimana Aline
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
14 May 2021
Case Number
RPAA 00091/2020/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Jurisdiction/in Limine Objection
Outcome
Objection to jurisdiction dismissed; Court of Appeal affirms its jurisdiction; case to proceed to hearing on merits.
Legal Topics
Appellate Jurisdiction, Admissibility of Evidence, Compensation for Damages, Procedural Irregularities
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Admissibility of Evidence Compensation for Damages Procedural Irregularities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Twagiramungu Jean Damascene

Appellant

Umuhoza Alliance

Civil Party

Mukeshimana Aline

Civil Party

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Jurisdiction/in Limine Objection

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear the second appeal where evidence was submitted after closure of hearing without reopening the proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the amount of compensation claimed affects the appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear the second appeal because the High Court relied on documents submitted after the closure of the hearing without reopening proceedings, as provided by Article 52(4) of Law No. 30/2018. The objection based on the amount of compensation is unfounded, as in criminal cases, jurisdiction is determined by the sentence imposed or by procedural irregularities such as reliance on late evidence.

Court Disposition

Objection to jurisdiction dismissed; Court of Appeal affirms its jurisdiction; case to proceed to hearing on merits.

Orders

  • Objection to jurisdiction raised by civil parties is dismissed.
  • Court of Appeal affirms its jurisdiction over the appeal.