UBUSHINJACYAHA v BAKUNDUKIZE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v BAKUNDUKIZE

The Court of Appeal found that Bakundukize was in quarantine from 03-16/06/2020 due to Covid-19, which constituted a valid and exceptional reason preventing him from appealing within the statutory period. Therefore, the time spent in quarantine should not be counted in the computation of the appeal period. The High...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00060/2023/CA
Parties
Applicant: Ubushinjacyaha; Respondent: Bakundukize Niyonsaba alias Mudori
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
16 January 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00060/2023/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Admissibility of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court decision quashed; case remitted for hearing on merits.
Legal Topics
Appeal Deadlines, Covid 19 Quarantine as Force Majeure, Admissibility of Appeal, Right to Be Heard
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Appeal Deadlines Covid 19 Quarantine as Force Majeure Admissibility of Appeal Right to Be Heard

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Applicant

Bakundukize Niyonsaba alias Mudori

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Admissibility of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in rejecting Bakundukize's appeal as out of time without considering his quarantine as a valid reason
  2. 2 Whether the period of Covid-19 quarantine should be excluded from the computation of the appeal period

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that Bakundukize was in quarantine from 03-16/06/2020 due to Covid-19, which constituted a valid and exceptional reason preventing him from appealing within the statutory period. Therefore, the time spent in quarantine should not be counted in the computation of the appeal period. The High Court erred in rejecting the appeal as out of time without considering this fact. The appeal was thus admissible and should be remitted to the High Court for hearing on the merits.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court decision quashed; case remitted for hearing on merits.

Orders

  • The appeal of Bakundukize Niyonsaba alias Mudori is declared admissible.
  • The High Court decision RPA 00356/2019/HC/RSZ of 24/11/2022 is quashed.