UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BAZIZANE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BAZIZANE

The sentence imposed is the minimum allowed by law for the offence after mitigation; further reduction is not legally permissible regardless of personal circumstances.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00688/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Ubushinjacyaha; Respondent: Bazizane Rosette
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
18 November 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00688/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Trafficking Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Applicant

Bazizane Rosette

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Bazizane Rosette can have her sentence further reduced after prior mitigation was applied

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed is the minimum allowed by law for the offence after mitigation; further reduction is not legally permissible regardless of personal circumstances.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal of Bazizane Rosette is dismissed as unfounded.
  • Judgment of High Court RPA 01317/2020/HC/KIG dated 29/05/2024 is upheld.