UBUSHINJACYAHA v GASANGWA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v GASANGWA

The appeal is dismissed because the evidence relied upon by the lower courts—comprising the victim's consistent testimony, corroborating witness statements, the medical report, and the accused's evasive conduct—was sufficient and credible. The accused's claims of family disputes and lack of direct medical evidence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00190/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Ubushinjacyaha; Respondent: Gasangwa Jean Marie Vianney
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 May 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00190/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Child Defilement, Evidence Assessment, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Child Defilement Evidence Assessment Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Applicant

Gasangwa Jean Marie Vianney

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there were flaws in the evidence relied upon by the lower courts to convict Gasangwa Jean Marie Vianney of defilement of a minor

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the evidence relied upon by the lower courts—comprising the victim's consistent testimony, corroborating witness statements, the medical report, and the accused's evasive conduct—was sufficient and credible. The accused's claims of family disputes and lack of direct medical evidence linking him to the crime do not undermine the conviction. The lower courts made no error in law or fact.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal of Gasangwa Jean Marie Vianney is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the High Court, Nyanza Chamber, case RPA 01067/2020/HC/NYZ of 27/02/2024, is affirmed.