UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HABINEZA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HABINEZA

The appellate court found that the sentence imposed by the High Court (15 years imprisonment and RWF 5,000,000 fine) is the minimum allowed by the current law for the offence of drug trafficking, and there was no misapplication of law or discretion by the lower court. Suspension is not possible as the sentence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00030/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Ubushinjacyaha; Respondent: Habineza Jacques
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 December 2024
Case Number
RPAA 00030/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure, Mitigation of Sentence
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Trafficking Sentencing Appeal Procedure Mitigation of Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Applicant

Habineza Jacques

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Habineza Jacques should have his sentence further reduced and/or suspended

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court found that the sentence imposed by the High Court (15 years imprisonment and RWF 5,000,000 fine) is the minimum allowed by the current law for the offence of drug trafficking, and there was no misapplication of law or discretion by the lower court. Suspension is not possible as the sentence exceeds five years.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The High Court judgment (15 years imprisonment and RWF 5,000,000 fine) stands.
  • Court fees are to be borne by the State as the appellant is incarcerated and exempted from payment.