UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HARERIMANA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HARERIMANA

Although the appellant admitted the offence and asked for forgiveness, the manner in which he killed the deceased, cut the body into two parts, and discarded the remains in a pit to conceal the crime showed extreme and unusual cruelty and disrespect for human dignity. In those circumstances, the life sentence was...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Respondent: UBUSHINJACYAHA; Appellant: HARERIMANA PROTOGENE
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of the High Court, Rwamagana Chamber
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Murder, Appeal
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Murder Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

UBUSHINJACYAHA

Respondent

HARERIMANA PROTOGENE

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of the High Court, Rwamagana Chamber

  1. 1 Whether there were mitigating circumstances warranting reduction of a life sentence.
  2. 2 Whether the nature and manner of the offence justified maintaining the sentence imposed by the lower court.

Ratio Decidendi

Although the appellant admitted the offence and asked for forgiveness, the manner in which he killed the deceased, cut the body into two parts, and discarded the remains in a pit to conceal the crime showed extreme and unusual cruelty and disrespect for human dignity. In those circumstances, the life sentence was appropriate and should not be reduced.