UBUSHINJACYAHA v. KWITONDA_144392_kn

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. KWITONDA_144392_kn

The Supreme Court held that since the exact birth date was unknown and only the year 1991 was established, the principle favouring the accused required presuming the birth date as 31/12/1991. At the time of the offence (16/07/2005), the respondent was 13 years and 6 months old, below the threshold for criminal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.2-2016
Parties
Applicant: Ubushinjacyaha; Respondent: Kwitonda Jean Damascene
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
27 November 2015
Case Number
– RPAA0305/11/CS
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed; conviction and sentence overturned
Legal Topics
Application of More Lenient Criminal Law, Juvenile Criminal Responsibility, Burden of Proof Regarding Age
Criminal Law Application of More Lenient Criminal Law Juvenile Criminal Responsibility Burden of Proof Regarding Age

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Applicant

Kwitonda Jean Damascene

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Kwitonda Jean Damascene can be held criminally responsible for the offence given his age at the time of commission
  2. 2 Which criminal statute applies when two laws prescribe different penalties

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that since the exact birth date was unknown and only the year 1991 was established, the principle favouring the accused required presuming the birth date as 31/12/1991. At the time of the offence (16/07/2005), the respondent was 13 years and 6 months old, below the threshold for criminal responsibility. Therefore, he could not be held criminally liable for the offence and must be released immediately.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; conviction and sentence overturned

Orders

  • Respondent to be released immediately upon pronouncement of judgment.
  • Court fees to be borne by the State.