UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUKESHIMANA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUKESHIMANA

The Court of Appeal did not render a judgment on the merits in RPAA 00639/2021/CA but only ruled on a jurisdictional objection; therefore, it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a review application on new evidence. The application is inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/RP 00048/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Ubushinjacyaha; Respondent: Mukeshimana Elias
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
30 September 2025
Case Number
RS/REV/RP 00048/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Application for Review on New Evidence
Outcome
Application dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Review of Judgments, Jurisdiction, New Evidence, Drug Offences
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Review of Judgments Jurisdiction New Evidence Drug Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Applicant

Mukeshimana Elias

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Application for Review on New Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to entertain an application for review on new evidence for a judgment it did not render on the merits
  2. 2 Whether the application for review on new evidence is admissible

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal did not render a judgment on the merits in RPAA 00639/2021/CA but only ruled on a jurisdictional objection; therefore, it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a review application on new evidence. The application is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • The application for review on new evidence is not admitted.