UBUSHINJACYAHA v NDABASANZE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NDABASANZE

The evidence shows Ndabasanze Bernard intended to kill his wife using a lethal weapon targeting the head and hand, supported by his own admissions and witness testimony. The correct conviction is attempted murder, not assault. The sentence imposed should be corrected to the minimum allowed by law due to mitigating...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00291/2025/CA
Parties
Applicant: Ubushinjacyaha; Respondent: Ndabasanze Bernard
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 August 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00291/2025/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal partially allowed
Legal Topics
Attempted Murder, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Attempted Murder Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Applicant

Ndabasanze Bernard

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Ndabasanze Bernard should be convicted for attempted murder or intentional assault
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed should be reduced

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence shows Ndabasanze Bernard intended to kill his wife using a lethal weapon targeting the head and hand, supported by his own admissions and witness testimony. The correct conviction is attempted murder, not assault. The sentence imposed should be corrected to the minimum allowed by law due to mitigating circumstances.

Court Disposition

appeal partially allowed

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed only regarding the sentence.
  • The conviction for attempted murder stands.