UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UWAMURENGEYE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UWAMURENGEYE

Evidence established intent to kill through repeated blows and motive, qualifying the act as parricide. Previous judgments were invalid due to lack of jurisdiction. The trial must commence anew in the competent court.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.1 - 2014
Parties
Applicant: Ubushinjacyaha; Respondent: Uwamurengeye Vénant
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
31 January 2014
Case Number
RPAA 0110/10/CS
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; previous judgments set aside; trial to commence anew in competent court.
Legal Topics
Parricide, Change of Charge, Jurisdiction, Intent, Mental Health in Criminal Liability
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Parricide Change of Charge Jurisdiction Intent Mental Health in Criminal Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Applicant

Uwamurengeye Vénant

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the charge against Uwamurengeye Vénant should be changed from assault causing death to parricide
  2. 2 Whether previous judgments should be set aside due to lack of jurisdiction
  3. 3 Whether there was intent to kill and mental capacity

Ratio Decidendi

Evidence established intent to kill through repeated blows and motive, qualifying the act as parricide. Previous judgments were invalid due to lack of jurisdiction. The trial must commence anew in the competent court.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; previous judgments set aside; trial to commence anew in competent court.

Orders

  • Previous judgments RP.0149/08/TGI/RSZ and RPA 0151/09/HC/RSZ set aside.
  • Trial for parricide to start afresh in Rusizi Intermediate Court.