UBUSHINJACYAHA v. ZOMAHOUN N’ABANDI

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. ZOMAHOUN N’ABANDI

The Court of Appeal held that Zomahoun's appearance via Skype did not constitute legal surrender as required by Article 168 of Law Nº 027/2019; therefore, he must still be treated as a fugitive, and the High Court erred in allowing his participation and ordering his interrogation online. The appeal proceedings must...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.3-2024
Parties
Applicant: Ubushinjacyaha; Respondent: Zomahoun Sosthène Thierry; Respondent: Kibuye Mukwende Jean Pierre; Respondent: Umulinga Alice
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
12 February 2025
Case Number
UBUSHINJACYAHA V. ZOMAHOUN N’ABANDI
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appellate (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court decision set aside.
Legal Topics
Trial in Absentia, Appeal Procedure, Rights of the Accused, Use of Technology in Proceedings
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Trial in Absentia Appeal Procedure Rights of the Accused Use of Technology in Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Applicant

Zomahoun Sosthène Thierry

Respondent

Kibuye Mukwende Jean Pierre

Respondent

Umulinga Alice

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appellate (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether a person tried in absentia (as a fugitive) can appear in appellate proceedings without first submitting to investigative authorities as required by law
  2. 2 Whether the High Court erred in allowing Zomahoun to participate via Skype and ordering his interrogation online

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that Zomahoun's appearance via Skype did not constitute legal surrender as required by Article 168 of Law Nº 027/2019; therefore, he must still be treated as a fugitive, and the High Court erred in allowing his participation and ordering his interrogation online. The appeal proceedings must continue with Zomahoun considered as a fugitive unless he properly surrenders to investigative authorities.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court decision set aside.

Orders

  • The High Court's order permitting online interrogation of Zomahoun is annulled.
  • The case is remitted to the High Court to proceed with Zomahoun treated as a fugitive unless he surrenders as required by law.