Re URUGAGA RW’ABAVOKA

Re URUGAGA RW’ABAVOKA

The Supreme Court found that the High Commercial Court's decision in RCOMA 00350/2019/HCC does not constitute a binding precedent, as it has not been consistently applied in subsequent cases and there is no established line of authority. Therefore, there is no legal basis to overturn the decision or issue a new...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.4-2017
Parties
Applicant: Urugaga rw’Abavoka mu Rwanda (RBA); Respondent: Urukiko Rukuru rw’Ubucuruzi; Amicus Curiae: Kaminuza y’u Rwanda, Ishami ry’amategeko (UR/School of Law)
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 April 2017
Case Number
RS/CLR/SPEC 00001/2021/SC
Procedural Posture
Special Application to Supreme Court to Overturn Precedent / Final Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Value Added Tax (vat), Exported Services, Stare Decisis, Judicial Precedent, International Treaties
Tax Law Administrative Law Judicial Process Value Added Tax (vat) Exported Services Stare Decisis Judicial Precedent International Treaties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Urugaga rw’Abavoka mu Rwanda (RBA)

Applicant

Urukiko Rukuru rw’Ubucuruzi

Respondent

Kaminuza y’u Rwanda, Ishami ry’amategeko (UR/School of Law)

Amicus Curiae

Procedural Posture

Special Application to Supreme Court to Overturn Precedent / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the precedent set by the High Commercial Court in RCOMA 00350/2019/HCC regarding VAT on exported services should be overturned
  2. 2 Whether the interpretation of 'exported services' under Rwandan VAT law is consistent with international law and treaties

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found that the High Commercial Court's decision in RCOMA 00350/2019/HCC does not constitute a binding precedent, as it has not been consistently applied in subsequent cases and there is no established line of authority. Therefore, there is no legal basis to overturn the decision or issue a new guiding precedent. The application is dismissed for lack of grounds.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application by the Rwanda Bar Association to overturn the precedent in RCOMA 00350/2019/HCC is dismissed.