UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UWINKINDI
An indigent defendant does not have an absolute right to choose counsel; the competent authority may appoint counsel in the interest of justice, and this process was lawfully followed in this case. The appeal was properly admitted, but the substantive claim lacks merit.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RLR V. 4 - 2015
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Uwinkindi Jean
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2015
- Case Number
- RPA 0011/15/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Right to Counsel, Legal Aid, Choice of Counsel, Fair Trial, International Transfer of Cases
- Source Language
- rw
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Uwinkindi Jean
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant has an absolute right to choose counsel when indigent
- 2 Whether the appointment of counsel by the Bar Association for an indigent defendant is lawful
- 3 Whether the appeal was properly filed and admissible
Ratio Decidendi
An indigent defendant does not have an absolute right to choose counsel; the competent authority may appoint counsel in the interest of justice, and this process was lawfully followed in this case. The appeal was properly admitted, but the substantive claim lacks merit.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal of Uwinkindi Jean is dismissed as unfounded.
- The objection by the Prosecution regarding admissibility is dismissed as unfounded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment