UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UWINKINDI

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UWINKINDI

An indigent defendant does not have an absolute right to choose counsel; the competent authority may appoint counsel in the interest of justice, and this process was lawfully followed in this case. The appeal was properly admitted, but the substantive claim lacks merit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V. 4 - 2015
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Uwinkindi Jean
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
24 April 2015
Case Number
RPA 0011/15/CS
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Right to Counsel, Legal Aid, Choice of Counsel, Fair Trial, International Transfer of Cases
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Human Rights Law International Criminal Law Right to Counsel Legal Aid Choice of Counsel Fair Trial International Transfer of Cases

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Uwinkindi Jean

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the defendant has an absolute right to choose counsel when indigent
  2. 2 Whether the appointment of counsel by the Bar Association for an indigent defendant is lawful
  3. 3 Whether the appeal was properly filed and admissible

Ratio Decidendi

An indigent defendant does not have an absolute right to choose counsel; the competent authority may appoint counsel in the interest of justice, and this process was lawfully followed in this case. The appeal was properly admitted, but the substantive claim lacks merit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal of Uwinkindi Jean is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The objection by the Prosecution regarding admissibility is dismissed as unfounded.