UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UZABAKIRIHO N’UNDI_kn
Ntabanganyimana Félicien's admission did not warrant mitigation due to the extreme cruelty and premeditation of the murder; Uzabakiriho Bernard's passive presence and psychological support constituted accomplice liability, but his lesser role justified a reduced sentence.
- Citation
- RLR V.4-2018
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Uzabakiriho Bernard; Appellant: Ntabanganyimana Félicien
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2017
- Case Number
- RPAA0021/14/CS –RPAA0022/14/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal by Ntabanganyimana Félicien dismissed; appeal by Uzabakiriho Bernard partially allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Accomplice Liability, Mitigating Circumstances, Sentencing
- Source Language
- en, rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Uzabakiriho Bernard
Appellant
Ntabanganyimana Félicien
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ntabanganyimana Félicien should receive a reduced sentence for admitting guilt
- 2 Whether Uzabakiriho Bernard's role constitutes accomplice liability and warrants a lesser sentence
Ratio Decidendi
Ntabanganyimana Félicien's admission did not warrant mitigation due to the extreme cruelty and premeditation of the murder; Uzabakiriho Bernard's passive presence and psychological support constituted accomplice liability, but his lesser role justified a reduced sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal by Ntabanganyimana Félicien dismissed; appeal by Uzabakiriho Bernard partially allowed.
Orders
- Life imprisonment for Ntabanganyimana Félicien upheld.
- Uzabakiriho Bernard sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment