A v. B [2002] ScotCS 325 (17 December 2002)

A v. B [2002] ScotCS 325 (17 December 2002)

Section 108(3) of the 1996 Act and the contract require that adjudicator's awards are immediately enforceable; any contractual provision purporting to delay enforcement is void. The defenders' arguments based on contractual bar and retention fail because the contract, properly construed, does not prohibit immediate enforcement, and retention cannot be asserted after the adjudicator's decision is pronounced.

Citation
[2002] ScotCS 325
Parties
Pursuer: A; Defender: B
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
17 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Commercial Construction Contract Enforcement / Outer House, Court of Session, Debate and Motion for Summary Decree
Outcome
Decree granted in favour of the pursuers for declarator and payment in terms of the adjudicator's award; defenders' pleas repelled; interest reserved.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Retention (scots Law), Liquidated Damages, Interpretation of Construction Contracts, Summary Decree
Construction Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Retention (scots Law) Liquidated Damages Interpretation of Construction Contracts Summary Decree

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A

Pursuer

B

Defender

Procedural Posture

Commercial Construction Contract Enforcement / Outer House, Court of Session, Debate and Motion for Summary Decree

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the contract prohibits immediate enforcement of an adjudicator's award until completion of the main contract or termination of the subcontract
  2. 2 Whether the defenders can rely on the principle of retention to resist enforcement of the adjudicator's award

Ratio Decidendi

Section 108(3) of the 1996 Act and the contract require that adjudicator's awards are immediately enforceable; any contractual provision purporting to delay enforcement is void. The defenders' arguments based on contractual bar and retention fail because the contract, properly construed, does not prohibit immediate enforcement, and retention cannot be asserted after the adjudicator's decision is pronounced.

Court Disposition

Decree granted in favour of the pursuers for declarator and payment in terms of the adjudicator's award; defenders' pleas repelled; interest reserved.

Orders

  • Repel defenders' first, second, fourth, and fifth pleas in law.
  • Sustain pursuers' first, second, and amended third pleas in law.