RBG Ltd v Sgl Carbon Fibers Ltd [2010] ScotCS CSOH_77 (22 June 2010)

RBG Ltd v Sgl Carbon Fibers Ltd [2010] ScotCS CSOH_77 (22 June 2010)

The adjudicator failed to exhaust his jurisdiction by not considering the defender's evidence and submissions regarding alleged earlier overpayments, which was necessary to determine the pursuer's entitlement to payment under the invoices. This failure rendered the adjudicator's decision a nullity.

Citation
[2010] ScotCS CSOH_77
Parties
Pursuer: RBG Limited; Defender: SGL Carbon Fibers Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
22 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action (payment Enforcement) / Judgment After Debate on Relevancy and Jurisdiction
Outcome
Action dismissed
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Natural Justice, Contractual Payment Mechanisms
Construction Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Jurisdiction of Adjudicator Natural Justice Contractual Payment Mechanisms

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

RBG Limited

Pursuer

SGL Carbon Fibers Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Commercial Action (payment Enforcement) / Judgment After Debate on Relevancy and Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator failed to exhaust his jurisdiction by not considering alleged earlier overpayments
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator acted in breach of natural justice by refusing to consider certain arguments and evidence
  3. 3 Whether the adjudicator's decision is a nullity for failure to address all relevant defences

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator failed to exhaust his jurisdiction by not considering the defender's evidence and submissions regarding alleged earlier overpayments, which was necessary to determine the pursuer's entitlement to payment under the invoices. This failure rendered the adjudicator's decision a nullity.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed

Orders

  • Sustain the first and fifth pleas-in-law for the defender
  • Repel the pleas-in-law for the pursuer